How Barack, Donald, Bernie, and Paul misuse the term inner city”

Emily Badger in the NYT:

But that’s the power of this perception. The phrase inner city” is often used to suggest that the historical image and the modern place are one and the same — or even that the inner city” is still a meaningfully identifiable place at all, with clearly implied demographics (black, poor) and connotations (violence, decay). It still evokes the particular context when the phrase became popular in the 1960s and 70s.

In reality, the central neighborhoods of many major American cities are thriving. A recent analysis by researchers at the Federal Housing Finance Agency found that home values had risen faster in the heart of big cities than anywhere else in the country over the last 25 years, a sign of their turnaround and a trend Mr. Trump, as a real estate developer, is likely to be aware of.

I’ve not been the only one cringing at this political season’s application of inner city.” It’s reminiscent of how the word blight was used in the 1950s and 60s.

(link h/t Gordon Venturella)


Tweet a comment

October 12, 2016 · city · inner city · politics · race · poverty · emily badger · nyt

Previous:The seven types of global city
Next:Mapping the invisible: the great Chicago map currently in development

· · · · ·